Legal Opinion
Forsyth v. Rowe
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 1993No. 14684PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a trust established for the benefit of the plaintiffs ward, Gregory Forsyth, and funded with the proceeds from the settlement of a suit brought on his behalf to recover damages for injuries he sustained in an automobile accident is a “medicaid qualifying trust”1 under 42 U.S.C. § 1396a (k).2 The plaintiff conservator was denied medicaid benefits by the defendant, department of income maintenance (department), and appealed to the trial court, which sustained the appeal. The department appealed the judgment of the trial court to the Appellate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Atkins v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lehman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Cohen v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- State v. LuziettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.