Smith v. Cigna HealthPlan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, J.
¶ 1 Appellant Sandra Smith, M.D., sued appellees, CIGNA HealthPlan of Arizona, Mitchell Hall, and Gilbert Burkel (collectively, “CIGNA”) for tortious interference with her employment and wrongful discharge. The trial court granted CIGNA’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that Smith’s claim was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 141 through 187 (the Act). Smith appeals that ruling. Because we conclude the present record establishes that Smith was a supervisor in her position with CIGNA, her claim is not preempted, and we reverse the trial…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Bohreer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- VICARI v. Lake Havasu CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna HighlandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.