Legal Opinion
Bohreer v. Erie Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 16, 2007No. 1 CA-CV 06-0277PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Judge.
¶ 1 This ease presents the question whether Arizona has general personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation which, at the time of the events leading to a lawsuit, had ceased doing business in Arizona, but had not withdrawn its appointment of the Director of Insurance (“Director”) as an agent for service of process until after it had been served with the complaint. We hold Arizona has general personal jurisdiction of the defendant pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 20-221(A) (2002) and the exercise of such jurisdiction comports with due process…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Lanham v. BNSF Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LemaireCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Desarrollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo, S.A. De C v. v. Kader Holdings Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.