Legal Opinion

VICARI v. Lake Havasu City

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 4, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0534PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

¶ 1 Richard Vieari and Color Arts Landscaping (collectively “Vieari”) appeal from the portion of the superior court’s final judgment that awarded $1,000 in attorneys’ fees to Lake Havasu City (“the City”). For the following reasons, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On June 12, 2007, Vieari, a subcontractor for Western Municipal Construction, Inc. (“Western”), filed a first-amended complaint against Western and the City for breach of contract. The complaint alleged, in part, that (1) the City owed Vieari a third-party contractual duty that arose from a contract between the City…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Janssen v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Logerquist v. McVeyArizona Supreme Court · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Medical Protective Company v. Herman PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Dobson v. McClennenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Ansley v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API