Legal Opinion

Wels v. Hippe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2017No. CC 101215E3; CA A150238; SC S063486PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

*571LANDAU, J.

Plaintiff seeks a prescriptive easement over an existing road that crosses defendants’ property. To establish a prescriptive easement, the law requires (among other things) that plaintiffs use of the road was adverse to the rights of the owners of the property. The dispute in this case is whether plaintiff satisfied the requirement to prove such adverse use. The trial court found that plaintiff did establish adverse…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Anthony v. Kennard Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wels v. HippeOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Albany & Eastern Railroad Co. v. Martell??Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hisey v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Waters v. Klippel Water, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Albany & E. R.R. Co. v. MartellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API