Legal Opinion
Lawrence v. Keokuk Steel Casting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1947No. 3449PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
On December 28, 1939, Keokuk Steel Casting Company,1 an Iowa corporation, entered into a contract2 with J. R. Lawrence 3 under which Lawrence was to act as agent for the Keokuk Company in the State of Oklahoma and designated parts of the States of Texas, Kansas, and Arkansas. The contract provided that the Keokuk Company would pay to Lawrence a 5 per cent commission on all of its products sold in such territory. It further provided:
“This contract is non-transferable.
*930“This contract shall remain in force continuously except that should either Company or Agent desire to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanders v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Nickel v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Leo Sanders and Jessie H. Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Leo Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Jessie H. Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T. Coleman Andrews, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Arthur L. Fleming, District Commissioner of Internal Revenue for Oklahoma and Texas, and Earl R. Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma v. Leo Sanders and Jessie H. Sanders, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- King v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Keokuk Steel Casting Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949