Keokuk Steel Casting Co. v. Lawrence
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
This case was before us on a former appeal. Lawrence v. Keokuk Steel Company, 1 10 Cir., 162 F.2d 929, 934. We there stated the facts reflected by the record on the former appeal and will not again .state them in detail.
On December 28, 1939, Lawrence entered into a written contract 2 with Keokuk whereby he agreed to act as- the agent of Keokuk in the sale of its products in certain designated territory. For his service, Keokuk agreed to pay Lawrence a commission of five per cent on all of its products sold in such territory. The contract, by its terms, was not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lawrence v. Keokuk Steel Casting Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States ex rel. Reischel & CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Shoemaker v. LeeperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Wunderlich Contracting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957