Helbush v. Mitchell
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
PETERS, J.
This is an action upon an installment promissory note. One of the defenses was usury. Trial was had, jury waived. Judgment was for plaintiff and defendants appealed. The only assignment of error meriting consideration is that the note is usurious.
The note in question is dated May 18, 1935; the principal amount is $2350 and is payable in forty equal installments of $58.75 on the 15th and 30th day of each month following the date of the note. The note contains no provisions for interest except interest after maturity and contains the usual acceleration clause.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago Corp. v. MundsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Stutsman County v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Whittlesey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Hale v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levy v. KimballHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- City and County of Honolulu v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- Metcalf v. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES'BEN. ASS'NHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Carey v. Discount Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1942
- Hilo Finance & Thrift Co. v. CareyHawaii Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.