Legal Opinion

Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Dottenheim

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1899PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Ejectment. Before Washington Dessau, Judge pro hac vice. Bibb superior court. April term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Celia Dottenheim brought an action of ejectment in the fictitious form against W. H. Ashworth as tenant in possession; and the Union Savings Bank and Trust Company, having been served as the true claimant in the case, came in and defended. The charge of the court was, in effect, a direction to the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, which was done. To this ruling the defendant excepted. The evidence established the following facts: Mrs. Dottenheim agreed to purchase the property now in controversy, at the sum of $3,250. Having the sum of $550, she applied to and obtained from…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. McAunich v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Crovatt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Community Loan & Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. City of Atlanta v. HudginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Thomas v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Patton v. Bank of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API