Legal Opinion

Hale v. Tyson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1918No. 3 Div. 325PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Gaston Gunter, Judge. Bill in equity by John R. Tyson against W. D. Hale. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The purpose of the bill was to establish and enforce an attorney’s lien on the real estate of the client the fruit of the litigation.

It is averred in the bill that during the year 1910, and on June 1st thereof, complainant, an attorney, practicing his profession, was employed by Mary M. Hale as administratrix of the Figh estate to collect a claim therefor, and that he obtained a judgment against one Fitzpatrick, causing the same to be registered as required by statute; that during 1914 he caused execution to issue and be levied on lands owned by the defendant in judgment; that at a sale of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wylie v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Denson v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Wright v. TebbittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harris's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Johnson v. GeraldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Owens v. BoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Gulf States Steel Co. v. JusticeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API