Legal Opinion

Chicago Corp. v. Munds

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 25, 1934PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

The defendants hold shares of convertible, preference stock of Continental Chicago Corporation which merged with Chicago Investors Corporation into a corporation called The Chicago Corporation, the com*145plainant in this cause. Continental Chicago Corporation appears to have been an investment corporation. Its assets totalled §21,658,694.02, consisting of cash amounting to over three million dollars, short term securities and notes receivable of nearly three million dollars, investments in the form of stocks and bonds of over fifteen million dollars and a few other smaller…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Cole v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
  4. Wittenberg v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1926
  5. Slaughter v. MooreCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  3. Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  4. Rapid-American Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  5. Application of Delaware Racing AssociationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API