Legal Opinion
Giusto v. Ashland Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 27, 1998No. Civil Action 97-5041PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DuBOIS, District Judge.
Defendant Lovella Hebert (“Ms. Hebert” or “defendant Hebert”) moves for dismissal of Count III of plaintiffs Complaint on three grounds: 1) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), because this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Ms. Hebert; 2) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), because the alleged defamatory statements were absolutely privileged under a judicial privilege or conditionally privileged as a communication between employer and employee; and alternatively, 3) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6),…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- D'ONOFRIO v. Il MattinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- SIMEONE EX REL. ESTATE SIMEONE v. Bombardier-RotaxDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re Royal Dutch/Shell Transport Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Roberson v. Cityscape Corp. (In Re Roberson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Smith v. IMG Worldwide, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.