SIMEONE EX REL. ESTATE SIMEONE v. Bombardier-Rotax
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCHILLER, District Judge.
This case arises from a plane crash that resulted in the death of two individuals. Presently before this Court is the question of whether Rotax, the Austrian-based manufacturer of the aircraft’s engine, should be required to defend itself in Pennsylvania. Three distinct theories of personal jurisdiction are at issue: (1) specific jurisdiction; (2) general jurisdiction; and (3) alter ego jurisdiction, i.e., jurisdiction over one company because it is functionally equivalent to another. While Rotax’s activities in Pennsylvania do not subject it to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Lutz v. Rakuten, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.