Legal Opinion

SIMEONE EX REL. ESTATE SIMEONE v. Bombardier-Rotax

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 2005No. Civil Action 02-4852PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SCHILLER, District Judge.

This case arises from a plane crash that resulted in the death of two individuals. Presently before this Court is the question of whether Rotax, the Austrian-based manufacturer of the aircraft’s engine, should be required to defend itself in Pennsylvania. Three distinct theories of personal jurisdiction are at issue: (1) specific jurisdiction; (2) general jurisdiction; and (3) alter ego jurisdiction, i.e., jurisdiction over one company because it is functionally equivalent to another. While Rotax’s activities in Pennsylvania do not subject it to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Lutz v. Rakuten, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API