Legal Opinion
Lerner v. Ceslik
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 24, 1989No. 6194PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The named defendant1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff in an action for the recovery of a real estate sales commission. The trial was held before a state trial referee who ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to recover $4155 and costs. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in interpreting the terms of the contract between the parties, (2) in finding facts that were not supported by the evidence and in reaching conclusions not supported by the facts, and (3) in draw*371ing an unfavorable inference against the defendant from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hart, Nininger & Campbell Associates v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Darling v. Town of WaterfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Russo v. TerekConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilcox Trucking, Inc. v. Mansour Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- In re Valerie D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Century 21 A. Francia v. Violette, No. Cv94-0536821-S (Apr. 4, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996