Legal Opinion
In re Valerie D.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 27, 1991No. 9140PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding her daughter, Valerie, to be a neglected child and terminating her parental rights with respect to that child. She challenges, in essence, the court’s (1) ruling that her conduct while she was pregnant with Valerie can support a neglect petition or a petition for termination of parental rights and (2) factual findings. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court could reasonably have found the following facts. Valerie was born on July 26, 1989. The birth was complicated by her passage of stool, or…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In re Amelia W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In Re Amber S., (June 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.