Legal Opinion
Russo v. Terek
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 6, 1986No. 4041PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiffs are appealing from the judgment of the trial court rendered on a factfinder’s report. The plaintiffs own real estate located directly behind land owned by the defendant, Catherine Terek. The only access to the plaintiffs’ land is by means of an express right of way, twelve feet in width, running west to east along the southerly boundary of the defendant’s land.
In 1927, Frank D’Elia, who at that time was the sole owner of the properties now owned by the plaintiffs and the defendant, conveyed by warranty deed the property presently owned by the defendant and retained the property…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- American Brass Co. v. SerraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Edgewood Construction Co. v. West Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- DiSorbo v. Grand Associates One Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Public Storage, Inc. v. Eliot Street Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Mierzejewski v. BrownellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.