Legal Opinion

Darling v. Town of Waterford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 27, 1986No. 3888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The basic issue of this appeal is whether a state trial referee, acting as the trial court, erred in denying, at the beginning of trial, the plaintiffs’ request to amend their complaint when that request had not *486been objected to by the defendant within fifteen days of the request in accordance with Practice Book § 176 (c). The plaintiffs appealed to the trial court from the defendant’s compensation award for the taking of a portion of the plaintiffs’ land for the installation of a sewer line. The amendment sought to include damages for trespass and consequential damages for the cost of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manning v. MichaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Lefebvre v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Delmore v. PolinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  5. Spoto v. Hayward Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hughes v. BemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Dennison v. KlotzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  3. State v. CrumbleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Burton v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API