Legal Opinion
State v. King
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2008No. S-07-458PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
750 N.W.2d 674 (2008)
275 Neb. 899
STATE of Nebraska, appellee,
v.
Donell KING, appellant.
No. S-07-458.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
June 13, 2008.
James J. Regan for appellant.
Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and George R. Love for appellee.
WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, McCORMACK, and MILLER-LERMAN, JJ.
CONNOLLY, J.
SUMMARY
In North Carolina v. Pearce,[1] the U.S. Supreme Court held that due process imposes a presumption of vindictiveness when, following a defendant's successful appeal, a sentencing judge orders a more severe sentence that is not justified by objective evidence in the record since…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Stevie Dewayne HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. LantzNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BerneyNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.