Legal Opinion

State v. Berney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2014No. S-13-829, S-13-830PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. BERNEY 377 Cite as

288 Neb. 377

CONCLUSION We find no error in the county court’s disposition of the various objections raised by the beneficiaries of the estate. The order of the county court overruling the beneficiaries’ objec- tions and ordering FNTC to proceed with the proposed distri- bution of the estate is affirmed. Affirmed. Wright, J., not participating. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Matthew Berney, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 20, 2014. Nos. S-13-829, S-13-830. 1. Sentences: Appeal and Error. An appellate court will not disturb a sen- tence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. LantzNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. StoneNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. TriceNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. HunnelNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API