Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Stites
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 28, 1918No. 7319PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This is an action brpughjt by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover damages for á malicious prosecution. The case was tried to a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500. Timely motion was made for a new trial, which was overruled, excepted to, and error brought to this court.
Por convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
On the trial of the case, it was admitted by the defendant that the plaintiff was arrested upon the complaint of defendant without the O. K of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BaroniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Dunnington v. LoeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CrowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- McKellop v. DewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Wilkin-Hale Bank v. HersteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bryan v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- First State Bank v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Thelma Oil & Gas Co. v. Sinclair Gulf Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Baumgart v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.