Legal Opinion
Michael Cramer v. Nancy Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2017No. 16-35215UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Michael Cramer appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Cramer’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Rounds v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 807 F.3d 996, 1002 (9th Cir. 2015), and we affirm.
Substantial evidence supports the determination by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that Cramer’s hepatitis C and degenerative disc disease had no more than a minimal effect on his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Vasquez v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- (SS) Shah v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Bell v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Black v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Cramer v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Ferguson v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.