Vasquez v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SELNA; Concurrence by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
ORDER AND AMENDED DISSENT
SELNA, District Judge:
ORDER
The opinion issued on November 5, 2008 is amended by inserting the following after the first paragraph of Judge O’Scannlain’s dissent on page 15123, 2008 WL 4791860:
Subsequent to our decision in this case, the government petitioned for rehearing en banc, arguing that the crediting-as-true rule is invalid because it is contrary to both statute and Supreme Court precedent. Vasquez did not respond to the government’s arguments in detail, and so I do not opine…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,555 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Debbra Hill v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
1,550 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.