Legal Opinion

(SS) Shah v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 4, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01184Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PARIMAL K. SHAH, No. 2:19-cv-1184-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 v. (ECF Nos. 12, 14) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security 18 denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security 19 Act.1 In his summary judgment motion, plaintiff contends the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) 20 erred by failing to treat his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Jack FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API