Legal Opinion
Molina v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 2012No. 10-16578PublishedCited by 5,168 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Edilia Molina appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. She argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by giving *1108inadequate weight to the opinions of her primary care provider, by improperly determining she was not credible, and by rejecting the testimony of her family members without comment. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5,168 opinions
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Michelle Ford v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Adrian Burrell v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
5,163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.