Legal Opinion

State Personnel Board v. Department of Personnel Administration

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2005No. S119498PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

The memoranda of understanding (MOU’s) of four state employee bargaining units 1 allow covered employees to challenge disciplinary actions either by seeking review before the State Personnel Board or by pursuing an alternative grievance/arbitration procedure that bypasses the State Personnel Board. The Legislature ratified the grievance/arbitration procedures set forth in the four MOU’s by enacting implementing legislation. (See Gov. Code, § 18670, subds. (c), (d) & (e); further undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code.)

Does this bypass of the State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Professional Engineers in California Government v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Shaw v. People Ex Rel. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Grossmont Union High School District v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API