State Personnel Board v. Department of Personnel Administration
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
The memoranda of understanding (MOU’s) of four state employee bargaining units 1 allow covered employees to challenge disciplinary actions either by seeking review before the State Personnel Board or by pursuing an alternative grievance/arbitration procedure that bypasses the State Personnel Board. The Legislature ratified the grievance/arbitration procedures set forth in the four MOU’s by enacting implementing legislation. (See Gov. Code, § 18670, subds. (c), (d) & (e); further undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code.)
Does this bypass of the State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Shaw v. People Ex Rel. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Grossmont Union High School District v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.