Legal Opinion

Willis v. Donac

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1884No. Case No. 4967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Llano. Tried below before the Hon. John C. Townes. It is unnecessary to give a statement of this case, since the opinion relates only to matters of practice.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.—

The question involved in this case was evidently one of boundary; for the title of the appellees to the Phdlip Jung survey is admitted, as is the title of the appellants to the George Wengal survey.

The manner in which the respective parties acquired titles to these surveys, which are contiguous, does not appear; it, however, appears by evidence not objected to, that the Jung survey once belonged to O. A. Cooley.

The first assignment calls in question the ruling of the court below in admitting the evidence of the witness Weeks, who testified to the declarations of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockett v. SchurenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Leon & H. Blum v. Schram & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Alamo Fire Insurance Co. v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Ballard v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API