Legal Opinion

Alamo Fire Insurance Co. v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1894No. 376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Bee.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellee, as the duly qualified survivor of her husband, R. A. Lancaster, instituted this suit to recover the sum of $1800 insurance money alleged to be due by reason of the destruction by fire of a certain two-story dwelling in the town of Bee-ville, and the furniture therein contained. Appellant set up conditions in the policy which it alleged had been infracted, among the number being, that the ground on which the house stood was not owned by R. A. Lancaster; that he had employed an incendiary to burn the house; that it had been insured as a dwelling house, but was a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Philipowski v. SpencerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Savage v. . Howard Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Tyler v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. East Texas Fire Insurance v. DychesTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Traylor v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. HalloranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Continental Ins. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. McGeorge v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API