Heffron v. Pollard
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Stewart..
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.—
There was a motion submitted with this case to strike from the record certain bills of exceptions which appear in the statement of facts. A ground of the motion is that the statement of facts appears to have been filed more than ten days after the motion for a new trial was overruled. The statute requires that bills of exceptions shall be filed during the term (Rev. Stats., art. 1364), and it has been accordingly held that an exception which is shown by a statement of facts filed after the final adjournment can not be considered. Willis v. Donac, 61 Texas, 588;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bartlett v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Lockett v. SchurenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Hall v. CrandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Lander v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Willis v. DonacTexas Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Brackenridge v. Claridge & PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Sanger v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Gohlman, Lester & Co. v. WhittleTexas Supreme Court · 1925
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.