Legal Opinion

Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1889No. 6610PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from Taylor. Tried below before Hon. Wm. Kennedy. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This wits an action brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover an indebtedness evidenced by three promissory notes, less certain admitted credits.

To the petition the defendants below answered that after the execution of the notes the plaintiffs and defendants had had an adjustment of accounts, and that for the indebtedness then found to be due defendants had executed and delivered to plaintiffs three other promissory notes extending the times of the payments, which it was expressly agreed between the parties were to be received in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. GageTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. King v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Franklin v. TiernanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Endick v. EndickTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Orr & Lindsey Shoe Co. v. FerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Holloway Seed Co. v. City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Childs v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Alexander v. Bank of American National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Cooper v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Englander Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API