Legal Opinion

Lockett v. Schurenberg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1884No. Case No. 1644PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from "Washington. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The first, second and fourth assignments of error relate to the giving and refusing to give charges. These assignments cannot be considered in the absence of a statement of facts. Flanagan v. Ward, 12 Tex., 209; Cannovan v. Thompson, 12 Tex., 248; McMahan v. Rice, 16 Tex., 339; Hutchins v. Wade, 20 Tex., 9; Fulgham v. Bendy, 23 Tex., 64; Birge v. Wanhop, 23 Tex., 441; Smith v. Tucker, 25 Tex., 594; Frost v. Frost, 45 Tex., 325; Ross v. McGowen, 58 Tex., 603.

This cause was tried at a term of the district court for Washington county which ended on the 28th day of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ross v. McGowenTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Texas & Pacific R'y Co. v. McAllisterTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hutchins v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Smith v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. King v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1856

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Heffron v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. New York and Texas Land Co. v. HylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Ivy v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LochlinTexas Supreme Court · 1895

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API