Legal Opinion

Security National Bank v. Bridgers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakkson, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendants, in the court below, made a motion as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below sustained the motion and in this we can see no error.

The evidence was to the effect that on 10 June, 1930, the Pinetops Banking Company was appointed administrator of the estate of W. R. Tolston. The following are the heirs at law and distributees: Thomas L. Tolston, Mrs. W. D. "Wooten, and Mrs. J. E. Brown. The estimated value of the estate was $20,000. Renunciation of the heirs at law and request that the Pinetops Banking Company be appointed in their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnis v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Roebuck v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. In Re Will of MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Holmes v. WhartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Minnis v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. BagleyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
  2. In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. WillettsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  4. Alford v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. F-F Milling Co. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API