Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Roebuck v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaricson, J.

The judgment of the court below shows: “Both plaintiffs and defendants being represented by counsel and present, the parties having waived a jury trial and agreed for the court to find the facts and the court, after hearing the evidence and arguments, finds the following facts.”

In Colvard v. Dicus, 198 N. C., at p. 271, this Court said: “A jury trial was waived and the trial judge found the facts and entered judgment thereon. There was evidence to support the findings of fact, and the facts found support the judgment. In such event the findings of fact and the judgment thereon are conclusive.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Laclede Bank v. SchulerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Boyden v. President of the BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. Eley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Wood v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. In re Estate of SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Edgecombe Bank & Trust Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. McGuinn v. . High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API