Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Wharton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOoNNOE, J.

Defendant in his answer denies the allegation in the complaint that plaintiff is the lawfully appointed and legally qualified administrator of the deceased, Eobert L. Holmes, Jr. He alleges that at the time of his death, deceased was domiciled in Eoekingham and not in Alamance County. He contends that the appointment of plaintiff as administrator of Eobert L. Holmes, Jr., deceased, by the clerk of the Superior Court of Alamance County was void, for that said deceased was not at or immediately previous to his death, domiciled in Alamance County. C. S., 1, subsec. 1.

Upon the issue thus raised…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Fann v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Young v. . Stewart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Avery v. . BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Dowell v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davenport v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Coley Ex Rel. Coley v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Kwiatkowski v. John Lowry, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Little v. Power Brake CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Dowell v. . RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API