Alford v. Shaw
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
None of the parties raises the issue, but we must first address the appealability of the judgment. In re Watson, 70 N.C. App. 120, 318 S.E. 2d 544 (1984). The summary judgment disposed of fewer than all parties, leaving the Shaw group nominally in the action, and the court did not certify that there was no just reason for delay. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure (1983). Since the unresolved claim against the Shaw group is also a derivative claim, whether or not the order was technically interlocutory it did in fact effectively terminate…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Rosengarten v. BuckleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.