Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Kononen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 30, 1989No. CSC 88-0481; CA A49273PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiffs filed an FED action for possession of an apartment. After a motion to dismiss was allowed, the court entered a document entitled “Order of Dismissal” that said:
“THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed.”
Defendant then petitioned for attorney fees, and the court entered an order denying attorney fees. Defendant appealed from the latter order.
After the briefs were filed, we issued this order:
“This appeal is taken from an order denying defendant’s request for an award of attorney fees in the trial court. Generally, an order denying an award of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Gillespie v. KononenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.