Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Kononen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1991No. CSC 88-0481; CA A49273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals from the denial of her motion for attorney fees under ORS 91.755 (since renumbered as ORS 90.255) in this residential FED action.1 We reverse and remand.

Because the procedural history of the case has some bearing on the merits, we will describe it briefly. After defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, plaintiffs voluntarily moved to dismiss the action. The trial court entered an order of dismissal. Thereafter, defendant moved for attorney fees. Less than 15 days after the motion was filed, the trial court signed the order denying attorney fees, and plaintiffs therefore did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. West v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Gillespie v. KononenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cedar Lodge Ltd. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Tanner v. GrissomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API