Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter James Holler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2005No. 03-50129PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Peter James Holler appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute and attempted possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and affirm in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a “reverse sting” operation in which defendant Peter James Holler conspired with co-defendants Nelson Palacio and Gustavo Estrada to purchase a large amount of cocaine from a confidential…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fernando Vizcarra-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jose Arambula-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Guzman-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Ozine BridgeforthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.