United States v. Guzman-Padilla
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOGEL, District Judge:
Daniel Guzman-Padilla (“Guzman”) and Juan Vasquez-Rosales (“Vasquez”) (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence discovered during a stop and search of their vehicle by U.S. Border Patrol agents on February 4, 2007 near the border between the United States and Mexico. Believing that Appellants’ vehicle recently had crossed the border and was carrying contraband, Border Patrol Agent Marc Battaglini instructed that a controlled tire deflation device (“CTDD”) be deployed in the vehicle’s path. As intended, all four…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Howard CottermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Sierra Club v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. RedlightningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Reginald EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.