Legal Opinion

United States v. Guzman-Padilla

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2009No. 08-50114, 08-50118PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOGEL, District Judge:

Daniel Guzman-Padilla (“Guzman”) and Juan Vasquez-Rosales (“Vasquez”) (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence discovered during a stop and search of their vehicle by U.S. Border Patrol agents on February 4, 2007 near the border between the United States and Mexico. Believing that Appellants’ vehicle recently had crossed the border and was carrying contraband, Border Patrol Agent Marc Battaglini instructed that a controlled tire deflation device (“CTDD”) be deployed in the vehicle’s path. As intended, all four…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard CottermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Sierra Club v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. RedlightningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Reginald EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API