Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2008No. 06-50599, 06-50608, 06-50612PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

David Williams, William Steel, and Tal-ford Brown appeal their convictions following a jury trial for conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by robbery, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, and possession of a firearm during a drug crime and crime of violence. Williams, Steel, and Brown argue, inter alia, that there was insufficient evidence to support their convictions, that their indictment should have been dismissed because of outrageous government conduct, and that the district court should have declared a mistrial because a juror…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. KohringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. ShetlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API