Legal Opinion

Aimcor v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 30, 1998No. 93-06-00322. Slip. Op. No. 98-170Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DICARLO, Senior District Judge.

In accordance with the decision (September 9,1998) and mandate (November 2,1998) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aimcor v. United States, 154 F.3d 1375 (Fed.Cir.1998) affírming-in-part and reversing-in-part this Court’s decisions in Aimcor v. United States, 18 CIT 1117, 871 F.Supp. 447 (1994) (“Aimcor /”); Aimcor v. United States, 19 CIT 1497, 912 F.Supp. 549 (1995) (Aimcor II); Aimcor v. United States, 20 CIT -, 957 F.Supp. 289(1996) (Aimcor III); and Aimcor v. United States, No. 93-06-00322 (Apr. 9, 1996 Order), and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. And American Alloys, Inc. v. The United States, and Cvg-Venezolana De Ferrosilicio, C.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  3. Aimcor v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API