Legal Opinion
State v. Carroll
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 21, 2004No. 25, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
In Carroll v. State, 149 Md.App. 598, 817 A.2d 927 (2003), the Court of Special Appeals held that the failure of police officers in that case to knock-and-announce their presence prior to executing a search and seizure warrant was unreasonable. We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari, State v. Carroll, 374 Md. 582, 824 A.2d 58 (2003), to decide the correctness of that ruling.
The respondent, Kevin Powers Carroll, was arrested and charged with possessing a regulated firearm after having been convicted of a “felony crime of violence,” as proscribed by Md.Code…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State v. OforiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.