Legal Opinion

In re Exercise of Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1930PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Sec. 3, art. VII, of the constitution provides :

“The supreme court, except in cases otherwise provided in this constitution, shall have appellate jurisdiction only, which shall be coextensive with the state; but in no case removed to the supreme court shall a trial by jury be allowed. The supreme court shall have a general superintending control over all inferior courts; it shall have power to issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, injunction, quo warranto, certiorari, and other original and remedial writs, and to hear and determine the same.”

This grant of power is supplemented by sec.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Labor & Farm Party v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re HeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Petition of BreidenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API