Legal Opinion

Labor & Farm Party v. Elections Board

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1984No. 84-299-OAPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

On February 13, 1984, the petitioners filed a petition asking this court to exercise its original jurisdiction and, among other things, issue a writ of mandamus requiring the respondents to place the name of William Osborne Hart on the ballot as the Labor and Farm Party’s candidate for the office of president of the United States in the presidential preference election to be held April 3, 1984.

Because we conclude that this matter is publici juris, it is therefore appropriate for us to exercise our original jurisdiction. Furthermore, the statute applied by the respondents to keep Hart’s name…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La FolletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cousins v. WigodaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BurkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. HaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API