Legal Opinion
Petition of Breidenbach
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 24, 1934:
Wickhem, J.
The facts relating to this controversy, other than those heretofore recited, need not be set forth in detail. Suffice to say that the petitioners, at the time of the controversy in question, were receiving, in addition to payments from the state treasury, $1,000 per annum under the mandatory provisions of sec. 252.07, sub. (4), Stats., and $1,000 per annum under the provisions of sub. (5) of the same section, which reads as follows:
“(5) In every county having a population of five hundred thousand or more, and containing an entire…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Payne v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Recall Bennett Committee v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1952
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.