Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 228 opinions

INFORMATIONS for Writs of Injunction. These were informations filed in this court July 8, 1874, by the attorney general of this state, acting for the state, praying for writs of injunction to restrain the two defendant companies from exacting tolls for the carriage of passengers or freight in excess of the maximum rates established bych. 273, laws of 1874. "When these proceedings were commenced, there were pending in this court informations in the nature of •quo warranto,…

Read the full summary

INFORMATIONS for Writs of Injunction. These were informations filed in this court July 8, 1874, by the attorney general of this state, acting for the state, praying for writs of injunction to restrain the two defendant companies from exacting tolls for the carriage of passengers or freight in excess of the maximum rates established bych. 273, laws of 1874. "When these proceedings were commenced, there were pending in this court informations in the nature of •quo warranto, filed by the attorney general June 2, 1874, against the same defendants severally, to have a forfeiture of their charters…

1Opinion of the Court

■Ryan, C. J.

These causes, although before the court now on motion only, are of high importance, for both the interests and the principles which they involve. Most of the questions to be passed upon were elaborately argued with much learning and ability at the bar, and all have been patiently and laboriously considered by ns, in view of the gravity and delicacy of the decision which we have to make.

*512I I. The first question to be settled, and the one which has given us the greatest difficulty to settle, is the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the informations in these causes.

Since the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  4. Livingston v. MayorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  5. City of Georgetown v. THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by228 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API