State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Stitt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an original action commenced by Attorney General Bronson C. La Follette seeking a declaratory judgment that the State of Wisconsin Operating Notes of 1983 when issued, sold and delivered in the manner provided by the Authorizing Resolution issued by the State Building Commission pursuant to 1983 Wisconsin Act 3, will be valid enforceable contractual *361obligations of the State of Wisconsin. The respondents, both members of the legislature, ask this court to declare Act 3 invalid because it was not properly enacted and because it authorizes a state debt in violation of the state…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Doon Township v. CumminsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Flynn v. Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Board of Trustees v. Attorney General of the CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.