Giesler v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
Summary
This government contract case involves the doctrine of “unilateral mistake.” The doctrine holds that a government contract may be reformed or rescinded if the contracting officer accepts a bid with actual or constructive knowledge that it contains an *738error. On cross-motions for summary judgment, we find for the plaintiffs.
Introduction
To the plaintiffs, Mr. James Giesler and Mr. Luke Coniglio, who do business as Central Park, the facts are quite simple: Central Park bid on a contract for mixed nuts with no more than 10% peanuts, using prices quoted to it by its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- American Ship Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Ruggiero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Liebherr Crane Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Morris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Griffy's Landscape Maintenance LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Camden Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009