Legal Opinion
Camden Shipping Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 15, 2009No. 09-600 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Camden Shipping Corporation (“Camden”) brings this pre-award protest contesting the Military Sealift Command’s (“MSC’s”) finding it ineligible for a contract to operate ships. Camden argues that MSC improperly removed it from consideration for award after MSC concluded that Camden’s offer had expired. MSC moves to dismiss Camden’s complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), arguing that (1) Camden does not have standing to pursue this bid protest, and (2) Camden has failed to state a claim for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Orion Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- ICP Northwest, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.