James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
This is a government contract case. James Giesler and Luke Coniglio, doing business as Central Park Company, appeal from the October 21, 1999 order of the United States Court of Federal Claims denying their motion for an award of attorney fees and costs, following the court’s September 15, 1999 decision granting summary judgment that Central Park deserves rescission of its unperformed contract with the United States for the supply of mixed nuts. Giesler v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 737 (1999). The United States cross-appeals the court’s decision to award the equitable…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Chernick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Neal & Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Ruggiero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- The Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- St Net, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.