Legal Opinion
Ruggiero v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 23, 1970No. 338-67PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
The plaintiffs sue to recover the sum of $11,520.20, representing part of a deposit totaling $25,260 which they made in bidding for the purchase of eight parcels of unimproved Government land situated in San Diego, California.
It is our opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover.
The plaintiffs are five members of the Ruggiero family, residing in or near Los Angeles, California, and doing business as partners under the name of Pacific Development & Investment Company. Michael Ruggiero, apparently the managing partner, is a school teacher. Anthony Ruggiero is a builder. Ralph Ruggiero…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Micheal Chernick and Belle Chernick v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Chernick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Wender Presses, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Medwin Benjamin, D/B/A Benjamin's for Motors, Medwin Benjamin, D/B/A Mill Basin Repair Company, and Medwin Benjamin, Individually v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Rhode Island Tool Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- The Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Lichtefeld-Massaro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Chris Berg, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.